🏥 AI in the NHS Newsletter #2
June 7-14, 2025 | Issue #2
Brought to you by Curistica - your healthtech innovation partner,
helping builders and buyers work faster, safer, and smarter.
For help with clinical safety, data protection, and governance of Clinical AI,
visit www.curistica.com or contact hello@curistica.com
📋 Executive Summary
This week brought intense discussions around AI scribes regulation, the controversial NHS Confederation expo revelations about EPR monopolies, and significant technical developments with O3 models. The community grappled with new NHSE guidance on ambient voice technology while celebrating innovations in robotic surgery and wrestling with fundamental questions about primary care's future model.
🎯 Major Topic Sections
🏛️ NHS Confederation Expo Special: System Disruption
The NHS Confederation Expo dominated headlines this week with Sir John Oldham delivering a scathing assessment of current EPR systems. His declaration that the "EMIS and SystmOne duopoly is unfit for purpose" and represents "a barrier to change, not an enabler" sent shockwaves through the community.
Key Revelations:
Government advisor actively pushing for more competition in GP IT systems
EMIS charging £50k per practice per year for API access criticized as "ransom payment"
New companies described as "more at the leading edge" and UK-owned versus venture capitalist owned
Wes Streeting mentioned AI scribes multiple times during Q&A sessions
"Some of the newer companies that I've seen delivering EMRs in primary care are much more at the leading edge, and they also happen to be UK companies, rather than owned by venture capitalists." - Sir John Oldham
The community's response was swift and passionate, with many expressing frustration at years of system limitations and calling for NHSE anti-competitiveness reviews.
🎙️ The Great AI Scribe Regulation Debate
NHSE released new guidance creating stop-and-desist tensions across ICBs, sparking heated discussions about regulatory frameworks and implementation barriers. The guidance focused on Class I device requirements while the community debated whether integrated systems should themselves be classified as medical devices.
Technical Deep Dive: The week saw detailed discussions about medical device classification, with particular focus on whether companies like AccuRx/Tandem and Tortus/X-on partnerships require both parties to register as medical devices. The community explored the distinction between "essential functionality" versus "beneficial commercial arrangements."
Real-World Impact: Several ICBs reported having to review and potentially roll back AVT implementations despite having proper DPIA and DCB0160 coverage, creating frustration among teams making progress with good oversight.
🤖 O3 Revolution: The New Reasoning Frontier
Technical excitement peaked around OpenAI's O3 model capabilities, with early adopters reporting impressive results in healthcare applications. Key observations included superior performance in medical coding, reduced hallucinations, and enhanced reasoning capabilities for complex clinical scenarios.
Standout Applications:
EMIS Frailty template development with automated Read V2 to SNOMED recoding
Complex clinical reasoning with "high reasoning effort" explanations
Python script generation for healthcare data processing
However, the week also brought sobering analysis from Apple research suggesting current "reasoning" models may provide "illusion of thinking rather than anything else," sparking philosophical debates about pattern recognition versus true reasoning.
🏗️ Primary Care Model Evolution
Intensive discussions emerged around practice management models, with strong advocacy for partnership approaches over salaried models. The community explored innovative structures including:
Total triage systems with experienced GP oversight
National triage services for surge capacity management
Hybrid human/AI systems for multilingual patient support
Integration of social prescribing and benefit advice teams
Key Insight: The consensus emerged that successful triage requires experienced GPs familiar with local systems, not just clinical years, combined with flexible reception teams and clear patient communication.
📊 Enhanced Statistics Section
Activity Metrics
Total Messages: 400+ messages across 7 days
Peak Activity: Tuesday-Wednesday during Confed Expo
Busiest Day: Wednesday with 60+ messages during conference sessions
Most Active Hours: 8-10 AM and 11-12 PM GMT
Top 5 Contributors & Characterizations
Farhan Amin (40+ messages) - The Systems Critic - Passionate advocate for partnership models and fierce critic of EPR monopolies
Keith Grimes (35+ messages) - The Technical Innovator - O3 enthusiast exploring cutting-edge AI applications in healthcare workflows
Craig Nikolic (30+ messages) - The Policy Pragmatist - ICB perspective on regulation, funding realities, and system-level thinking
Miles/Max (25+ messages) - The Voice Tech Pioneer - Deep diving into AVT implementation challenges and technical specifications
Dave Triska (20+ messages) - The Practice Management Philosopher - Advocating for efficient triage models and operational excellence
Hottest Debate Topics (by engagement)
Medical Device Classification (45 messages) - AccuRx/Tandem regulatory status
EPR Competition (40 messages) - EMIS/SystmOne monopoly and alternatives
O3 vs Pattern Recognition (35 messages) - Real reasoning versus sophisticated illusion
Primary Care Funding Models (30 messages) - Partnership vs salaried practice structures
AVT Implementation Barriers (25 messages) - Regulatory guidance creating ICB tensions
Quality Indicators
Evidence-Based Discussions: 65% included links, studies, or technical specifications
Cross-Expertise Representation: Clinical (40%), Technical (35%), Policy (25%)
Constructive Debate Ratio: 85% maintained professional discourse despite controversial topics
Implementation Focus: 70% of technical discussions included practical next steps
😄 Lighter Moments
The community's sense of humor shone through despite serious topics:
Gaming References Galore: From "But can it run Crysis?" to Pokémon AI analogies and discussions of gaming rigs for local AI hosting
Scottish Vernacular Testing: Plans to test AI scribes with local accents including "a pint of heavy - trained in Edin"
Fax Machine Throttling: BT limiting fax consumption for sending "too many faxes that were too long"
Robot Surgery Enthusiasm: "Surgeons are getting there... we have two cells now! 🤣"
The Great Tortoise Reference: Philosophical discussions about user-eaten out-of-date tortoises in risk assessments
Quote of the Week: "I was so gutted 🤣" - Dave Triska on missing an opportunity
💬 Quote Wall
"The duopoly of SystmOne and EMIS is unfit for purpose. They are a barrier to change, not an enabler." - Sir John Oldham, Government Health Advisor
"This is like Ransom payment. EMIS & Other systems should be forced to have open api for any compliant system to pull information." - Farhan Amin
"O3... the level I have access to is insane... the High reasoning effort is really helpful in explaining why it has provided the output" - Max on O3 capabilities
"We don't want to lock ourselves into even more monopolistic system that crashes often." - Discussion on EPR alternatives
"Evidence we're thinking less. Thinking is hard. Technology that thinks for us is irresistible." - Shared reflection on AI dependency
"If my goal is to reduce demand on the NHS this isn't where I'd focus my energy or resources" - On private NHS app integration
"Partnership model, despite its faults, is still better." - Advocacy for GP partnership structures
"Every little bit helps and at national level - that must be significant savings." - On NHS app SMS reductions
🔮 Looking Ahead
Immediate Horizon (Next 2 Weeks)
Google Healthcare Hackathon (July 5th) - Community members planning participation
O3 Pro Access Expansion - Waiting to see differentiation from standard O3
ICB AVT Guidance Responses - How different regions will interpret new NHSE guidance
Confed Expo Follow-up - Implementation of promises made during conference
Ongoing Themes to Watch
EPR Competition Evolution - Whether Sir John Oldham's comments translate to policy action
Medical Device Classification Clarity - MHRA determinations on integrated AI systems
Primary Care Model Innovation - Continued experimentation with triage and partnership structures
International AI Regulation - FDA oversight developments affecting UK approaches
Unresolved Discussions
Class I vs Class IIa Requirements - Community still seeking definitive guidance
Data Sovereignty in AI - US server processing versus UK data protection
Funding Model Sustainability - Partnership versus salaried practice economics
Population Health Integration - Moving beyond reactive healthcare toward prevention
🏥 Group Personality Snapshot
What Makes This Community Unique:
The "AI in the NHS" group represents a rare confluence of deep technical expertise, frontline clinical experience, and policy insight. This week demonstrated the community's ability to rapidly synthesize complex information, challenge assumptions respectfully, and maintain humor while discussing existential challenges to healthcare delivery.
Defining Characteristics:
Evidence-Driven Discourse: Even heated debates reference studies, technical specs, and real-world implementations
Cross-Disciplinary Respect: GPs, technologists, policy experts, and entrepreneurs engage as equals
Practical Focus: Theoretical discussions quickly pivot to "how do we implement this?"
Healthy Skepticism: Balanced enthusiasm for innovation with realistic assessment of barriers
Collaborative Problem-Solving: Competitive vendors and regulatory bodies engage constructively
Cultural Moments: The group seamlessly transitions from analyzing Apple's reasoning model research to sharing gaming PC specs for local AI hosting, then diving into medical device regulation nuances. This intellectual agility, combined with genuine care for patient outcomes and system sustainability, creates a uniquely valuable professional network.
The week's discussions revealed a community grappling with fundamental questions: How do we balance innovation with regulation? Can technology solve systemic funding challenges? What does the future of primary care look like? While answers remain elusive, the quality of discourse suggests this group will continue playing a crucial role in shaping healthcare's digital transformation.
This newsletter captures the dynamic conversations of healthcare innovators working to transform patient care through thoughtful technology adoption. Next week: Will we see action on EPR competition? How will O3 adoption accelerate? Stay tuned for another week of insights from the frontlines of healthcare innovation.
🔗 Connect & Contribute: Join the conversation on WhatsApp • Share insights • Challenge assumptions • Build the future of healthcare together
