🏥 AI in the NHS Newsletter #4

11 Mar

Issue 4 | 21st - 28th June 2025

Brought to you by Curistica - your healthtech innovation partner.
For help with clinical safety (DCB0129/0160), data protection (DPIA/Privacy Notices), and governance of Clinical AI that integrates with your ways of working,

visit www.curistica.com or contact hello@curistica.com

📋 Executive Summary

This week marked a historic breakthrough with NHS England's approval of Medicus Health's EPR system for primary care, sparking celebration and debate about breaking the EMIS-TPP duopoly. The group wrestled with clinical safety standards for DCB0160 reviews, explored the implications of mounting copyright lawsuits against AI companies, and delved into technical discussions about context engineering and emerging AI development tools. Amidst serious regulatory talk, lighter moments included humorous takes on AI job displacement and the ongoing triage culture in healthcare.

🎯 Major Topic Deep Dive

🚀 Breaking the Duopoly: Medicus EPR Approval Celebration

The week's biggest story was the NHS England approval of Medicus Health's EPR system for primary care, ending years of EMIS-TPP dominance. Group sentiment was overwhelmingly positive, with multiple congratulations flowing to the Medicus team and NHS England stakeholders.

Key insights emerged:

Regional leadership patterns: SWL, SEL, Cheshire & Merseyside, and Surrey Heartlands identified as "thought leaders" driving GP practice choice
Implementation challenges: Most ICBs remain implicitly "EMIS only" or "SystmOne only," perpetuating duopoly mindsets
RCGP response controversy: The college's focus on data security drew criticism, with members questioning whether this falls within their remit of "excellence in primary care"

"Thanks, it's been a long time coming and it's taken the help and support of hundreds of people across the NHS to even have been possible to get this far" - reflected the collaborative effort behind this milestone.

Implications: This approval represents more than technical competition—it's about patient safety improvements, operational efficiency, and breaking down systemic barriers that have "stifled progress for so long."

🛡️ Clinical Safety Standards: The DCB0160 Deep Dive

A rich discussion unfolded around reviewing DCB0160 clinical safety documentation, revealing both expertise and frustration within the community.

Top evaluation criteria identified:

Template originality: Avoiding obvious "logo-added" templates
Senior clinical involvement: Ensuring meaningful participation from responsible clinicians
Iterative design: Moving beyond one-off documentation approaches
Hazard coverage: Addressing major and moderate 0129 hazards comprehensively
Methodology consistency: Using structured risk description formats

Real-world challenges highlighted:

Gap between DCB standards theory and deployment practice
Focus on re-auditing manufacturer evidence rather than integration risks
Limited manufacturer involvement in hazard workshops
NHS toolkit essentially "re-auditing 14971 to the point of duplication"

The conversation revealed a community seeking more practical, workflow-focused safety assessments rather than duplicative compliance exercises.

⚖️ The Copyright Wars: Data as the New Battleground

A fascinating survey of the mounting legal landscape saw publishers and content creators taking on AI giants:

BBC vs Perplexity
Publishers vs Microsoft
Reddit vs Anthropic
New York Times vs OpenAI

"It is all about DATA :)" - succinctly captured the essence of these disputes. The group noted the irony that lawyers could potentially use ChatGPT to sue ChatGPT, adding levity to serious legal implications.

Strategic implications: These cases signal a fundamental shift in how training data is valued and protected, potentially reshaping AI development economics.

📊 Enhanced Statistics & Analytics

Activity Metrics

Total messages: 180+ substantive discussions
Peak activity: Thursday 27th June (60+ messages)
Engagement pattern: Extended Thursday morning discussions on EPR approval flowing into evening celebrations
Thread depth: DCB0160 discussion maintained 15+ message exchanges

Top Contributors & Community Roles

Clinical Safety Advocate - 12 messages focusing on risk management and compliance frameworks
Digital Innovation Enthusiast - 10 messages sharing industry developments and technical insights
GP Practice Technology Specialist - 8 messages on practical implementation challenges
Regulatory Affairs Expert - 6 messages on standards and compliance interpretations
Healthcare Technology Entrepreneur - 5 messages providing industry perspective

Hottest Debate Topics (by engagement)

Medicus EPR approval implications - 25+ responses across multiple threads
DCB0160 review methodology - 18 focused exchanges
RCGP response appropriateness - 12 critical discussions
AI triage system proliferation - 10 analytical responses
Copyright litigation impact - 8 strategic discussions

Discussion Quality Indicators

Evidence-to-opinion ratio: 65% factual/technical vs 35% opinion-based content
Cross-expertise representation: Strong clinical, technical, regulatory, and commercial perspectives
Constructive engagement score: High - disagreements remained professional and solution-focused
Knowledge sharing frequency: 15+ educational links and resources shared

😄 Lighter Moments & Group Dynamics

The group's personality shone through several memorable exchanges:

Political Commentary with Healthcare Twist: A tangent on UK political leadership led to observations about China's long-term strategic thinking, with "China are absolute GOATs of long term thinking" earning agreement about the contrast with short-termist UK politics.

Professional Conference Observations: A member's real-time conference reporting included the delightful observation of "A speaker WAY over time who responds to moderator prompt 'you didnt allocate enough time to me so I will continue to educate with my points'" - a scenario many could relate to.

AI Job Displacement Humour: When discussing autonomous AI taking jobs, the dry response "Erm... no" to a £600 AI subscription perfectly captured the group's practical scepticism about overhyped promises.

Technical Frustrations: The comment about AI-generated images - "Why does this person look like they've just been in a fight?" followed by "Was the prompt 'create an image of a beaten doctor'" - provided comic relief during serious discussions.

💬 Quote Wall

"Such a key moment for UK healthcare that's had progress so stifled for so long, more of the same!" - On the Medicus approval

"All of the liability. Little of the pay..." - Clinical safety officer's reality

"It's short-termist nonsense as the economy will tank entirely when so many skilled higher income people become unemployable" - On AI job displacement

"Evidence = king surely" - Core principle for healthcare decisions

"That needs to be disabled and whoever thought of it should never be allowed to use anything more technologically advanced than an Etch-a-sketch" - On problematic AI features

"Report as a near miss. This is not a joke. Illustrates a barn door hazard of uncontrolled copilot and AI use" - Clinical safety vigilance

"I wouldn't worry too much about autonomous AI taking jobs. To do so, it would be class III medical device status. Only one company ever achieved that" - Regulatory reality check

"Patients pay for appointments, Borrow Gryffindor sorting hat, Increase NHS funding > GDP!" - Alternative triage solutions

🔮 Looking Ahead

Immediate Priorities

Medicus implementation tracking: Monitoring which ICBs embrace multi-vendor approaches vs maintaining duopoly preferences
DCB0160 methodology refinement: Potential for community-developed better practice guidelines
Copyright case outcomes: Implications for NHS AI procurement and development strategies

Emerging Themes

Context engineering relevance: Growing recognition that effective AI deployment requires sophisticated context management
Clinical safety evolution: Movement from tick-box compliance toward workflow-integrated risk management
Triage proliferation concerns: Multiple AI triage layers potentially creating more barriers than solutions

Unresolved Questions

Which AI model powers the NHS App companion concept?
How will the Copilot trial progress beyond monitored email addresses?
Can the community develop better DCB0160 review frameworks?
What impact will mounting copyright litigation have on NHS AI strategies?

🏥 Group Personality Snapshot

This week showcased a community that perfectly balances technical rigour with human insight. The group demonstrates:

🔬 Evidence-based thinking - Quick to cite research, data, and regulatory frameworks whilst maintaining healthy scepticism about hype

⚖️ Ethical grounding - Strong focus on patient safety, clinical governance, and professional responsibility

🛠️ Practical wisdom - Real-world implementation experience tempering theoretical discussions

🤝 Collaborative spirit - Genuine celebration of others' successes (Medicus approval) and willingness to share knowledge

😊 Professional humour - Ability to find levity in serious topics without losing focus on important issues

🚀 Innovation appetite - Enthusiasm for technology balanced with understanding of regulatory and safety requirements

This unique combination of clinical expertise, technical understanding, regulatory knowledge, and collaborative culture makes this community an invaluable forum for navigating AI implementation in healthcare. The group serves as both early warning system for emerging issues and supportive environment for celebrating breakthrough moments like this week's historic EPR approval.

Issue 4 compiled from 180+ group messages | Next issue: 5th July 2025 Contributing voices represent NHS clinicians, technology leaders, safety experts, and digital health innovators