🏥 AI in the NHS Newsletter #5

21 Jul

Issue 5 | 28th June to 6th July, 2025

Brought to you by Curistica - your healthtech innovation partner.
For help with clinical safety (DCB0129/0160), data protection (DPIA/Privacy Notices), and governance of Clinical AI that integrates with your ways of working,

visit www.curistica.com or contact hello@curistica.com

📋 Executive Summary

A week of seismic announcements dominated by the government's 10-Year Health Plan launch on 3rd July, sparking intense debate about digital transformation ambitions, neighbourhood health centres, and the controversial claim that AI could replace 2,000 GPs. Alongside policy discussions, the group engaged in robust technical debates about AI scribes' real-world impact and continued wrestling with fundamental healthcare system challenges.

🎯 Major Topic Sections

💼 The 10-Year Plan: Ambition Meets Reality

The government's "Fit for the Future" plan launched on 3rd July dominated group discussions, with members dissecting its 168 pages of reform promises. The plan's digital ambitions drew particular scrutiny from the group's technology experts.

Digital Transformation Concerns: The group's tech strategist highlighted the "wildly ambitious" nature of the technology commitments, noting that achieving them would require "massive culture changes" and warning that implementation leaders would "age a decade for each year they're in charge." Practical barriers were immediately identified - some trusts still lack functional EPRs, and basic services like appointment booking through the NHS app remain blocked by policy constraints.

Neighbourhood Health Centres Redux: Several members recognised the neighbourhood care model as a revival of Lord Ara Darzi's 2008 polyclinic proposals. One experienced practitioner who had run a 12-hour-day, 7-days-a-week walking centre for eight years offered mixed views on the approach, suggesting these centres could serve as urgent care hubs to "offload urgent care from local practices and allow them to deliver planned care/prevention."

GP Partnership Implications: Members debated significant changes ahead for GP partnerships, including value-based funding models, neighbourhood contracts with wider geographical budgets, and enhanced accountability through public performance reporting and league tables. The shift towards rewarding outcomes rather than activity was seen as both opportunity and risk.

Implementation Scepticism: Despite some positive elements, members remained sceptical about delivery. One described it as "another wish list" lacking detailed implementation plans, with comparisons to previous failed initiatives. The recurring theme was ambitious vision undermined by absent delivery mechanisms.

🤖 AI Scribes: Promise vs Practice

The group engaged in nuanced discussions about AI scribes following government claims that AI could effectively replace 2,000 GPs through enhanced productivity.

The 2,000 GP Claim: NHS modelling suggesting that AI scribes could enable doctors to see one additional patient per session drew sharp criticism. Members questioned the mathematics, with one noting: "The only math model in which it makes sense is if the time saved is then used for other patients." The underlying assumption that freed time automatically equals increased patient throughput was challenged.

Real-World Experience: A practitioner using AI scribes provided honest feedback: "It's good if doctor is very slow typer. For me it slows me down, but gives me more pt eye contact and bit easier on brain and multi-tasking." They noted using it primarily when tired but reverting to manual typing when fully focused, highlighting that productivity claims don't match individual working patterns.

Quality vs Quantity Debate: The group emphasised that AI scribes' primary value lies in improving consultation quality rather than quantity. Time savings should enhance patient-clinician interaction rather than simply enabling more appointments. Recent Health Foundation data suggested only 27% of time freed by technology would be used for direct patient care, translating to merely 8 minutes of additional patient-facing time per day.

Server Costs Reality Check: A practical voice noted that running AI models can actually cost more than hiring GPs, questioning the economic logic behind replacement strategies.

🔄 Healthcare System Reform Tensions

Fundamental disagreements emerged about healthcare system organisation and the balance between different care models.

Primary vs Secondary Care Dynamics: The group explored reversing traditional referral patterns, with suggestions for secondary care consultants partnering in GP practices and delivering specialist services in community settings. One member estimated that over 75% of hospital clinics could be delivered in large primary or community care centres, except for procedures requiring expensive equipment.

Referral System Frustrations: Ongoing battles with bureaucratic referral processes sparked heated exchanges. Members shared experiences of referrals being rejected for administrative reasons - wrong forms, incorrect templates, or arbitrary requirements. The fundamental principle that "if a GMC registered doctor feels it necessary to refer a patient for care then only another GMC registered doctor should be able to say 'no'" was strongly supported.

Cultural Resistance: The group identified culture as the biggest barrier to meaningful change, with different approaches applied to GPs versus other providers. Historical examples included GPs being paid significantly less than vaccine centres or pharmacies for COVID vaccinations, despite delivering similar services.

📱 Technology Implementation Challenges

Technical discussions revealed the gap between policy ambitions and practical realities.

Interoperability Issues: Members highlighted fundamental problems with current systems, including the inability to get practice appointments on the NHS app due to policy constraints, and the continued reliance on antiquated processes like fax machines (which the plan promises to eliminate - described as "taking credit for something already done years ago").

Data Controller Complexities: Legal questions arose about practice data controller status and whether this would be amended to support the plan's digital integration goals.

Forms vs Modern Solutions: A passionate debate emerged about referral forms, with members advocating for automatic information transfer rather than tick-box bureaucracy. The vision was for consultations to be "automatically transferred into the system for the patient to be seen by the specialist" without arbitrary hurdles that disadvantage vulnerable patients.

📊 Enhanced Statistics Section

Activity Metrics

Total Messages: 247 messages over 8-day period
Peak Activity: 3rd July (plan launch day) with 89 messages
Busiest Hour: 10:00-11:00 on 3rd July as plan details emerged
Daily Average: 31 messages per day
Weekend vs Weekday: Surprisingly active weekend discussions (23% of total volume)

Top 5 Contributors

Technology Strategist - 34 messages | Leading voice on digital transformation challenges and system architecture
Primary Care Advocate - 28 messages | Passionate defender of GP interests and system reform critic
Clinical Safety Expert - 23 messages | Balanced perspectives on AI implementation and patient safety
Policy Analyst - 19 messages | Deep dives into plan implications and regulatory frameworks
Innovation Specialist - 16 messages | Forward-thinking contributions on tech possibilities and limitations

Hottest Debate Topics (by engagement)

10-Year Plan Digital Ambitions - 67 messages | Mix of excitement and scepticism about feasibility
AI Scribes Productivity Claims - 43 messages | Technical debate about real-world effectiveness
Neighbourhood Health Centres - 38 messages | Historical context and implementation concerns
Referral System Reform - 29 messages | Frustration with bureaucratic barriers
GP Partnership Future - 24 messages | Strategic implications of funding model changes

Discussion Quality Indicators

Evidence-Based Contributions: 34% | High proportion of experience-backed insights
Cross-Expertise Representation: Clinical (45%), Technical (28%), Policy (18%), Other (9%)
Constructive Debate Ratio: 4.2:1 | Healthy balance of challenge and support
Solution-Oriented Posts: 42% | Focus on practical improvements rather than complaints

😄 Lighter Moments

Festival Vibes: Our newsletter curator made multiple references to attending the Love Supreme jazz festival, creating amusing juxtapositions between policy analysis and funk music. The irony wasn't lost on members when posts about "Love Supreme" appeared alongside fertility AI breakthroughs.

Meme Culture: The group's appreciation for visual humour continued with historical medical documents and playful references to radiologists being called "Bones" (Star Trek reference). One member threatened to create more euphemism memes, much to the group's mock horror.

ChatGPT Journalism: A brilliant Daily Mail-style summary of the 10-Year Plan generated by ChatGPT provided comic relief, complete with sensationalist headlines and tabloid formatting that captured the publication's distinctive voice perfectly.

Quantum Computing Promises: Light-hearted scepticism about quantum computing paralleled AI hype, with one member noting they've been promised quantum breakthroughs "for most of my adult life."

LinkedIn Bot Anxiety: A member's struggle with LinkedIn's anti-bot measures created sympathy and amusement as they waited 2-5 business days for verification whilst "simply accessing from a different location."

💬 Quote Wall

"The one bit of the 10 Year Plan I'm confident of commenting on today is the tech bit. It's wildly ambitious. To achieve it will need massive culture changes, senior folk will need crowbars to get people's hands off the 'it's always been done this way'." - Technology strategist on digital transformation challenges

"AI as a good has amazing potential - it can liberate clinicians & become truly patient centred. But, the notion it saves money is 'pie in the sky' incompetence from politicians." - Clinical expert on AI economics

"My long held view is that if a GMC registered doctor feels it necessary to refer a patient for care then only another GMC registered doctor should be able to say 'no'." - Practitioner on referral gatekeeping

"For me it slows me down, but gives me more pt eye contact and bit easier on brain and multi-tasking. I use it when I'm tired." - Honest assessment of AI scribe reality

"The more LLM I use the more irritating they become. Keep making the same mistakes. Never learns, keeps changing like NHS." - Frustrated user on AI limitations

"Too much is made of there being two systems: NHS and US system. Both sides panic about being made into the other, rest of the world remains baffled at this binary bun fight." - International perspective on healthcare debates

"What if you had to pay? The parameters for pay could be money or time. Would this change your choice?" - Thought-provoking question on healthcare utilisation

"Healthcare around the world functions under an inverse bureaucracy. While power is typically concentrated at the top in most sectors, in healthcare, it is largely wielded by highly skilled workers who possess specialised knowledge and directly serve patients." - Systems analyst on healthcare power dynamics

🔮 Looking Ahead

Plan Implementation: Expect continued analysis as members digest the 168-page document more thoroughly. Questions about funding mechanisms, delivery timelines, and regulatory changes will likely dominate future discussions.

AI Scribe Rollout: With government commitments to AI deployment, the group will closely monitor real-world implementations and their impact on clinical workflows. Members' direct experiences will provide valuable counterpoints to official metrics.

Neighbourhood Centre Developments: Watch for practical updates on neighbourhood health centre pilots and their effect on existing practice models. Members with polyclinic experience will provide crucial insights.

Technology Integration: Ongoing battles with interoperability and digital transformation will remain central themes as practices navigate the gap between policy ambitions and technical realities.

Workforce Model Evolution: Discussions about new roles, skill-mixing, and career pathways in an AI-augmented NHS will intensify as implementation plans emerge.

Newsletter Schedule: Your jazz-loving curator promises the next edition will arrive Monday afternoon, with expectations of "high triple figure notifications to wade through" - don't disappoint!

🎭 Group Personality Snapshot

This week revealed the group's remarkable ability to balance technical expertise with practical wisdom. Members demonstrated their value as a community by:

Cutting Through Hype: Refusing to accept government claims at face value, instead applying real-world experience to policy promises. The group's healthy scepticism serves as a valuable reality check on ambitious proposals.

Supporting Innovation: Despite criticisms, members remained open to technological possibilities whilst demanding evidence-based implementation. Their nuanced approach to AI scribes exemplified this balanced perspective.

Maintaining Humanity: Even amid serious policy debates, the group preserved its humour and humanity. From jazz festival updates to meme threats, the community aspect remains strong.

Embracing Complexity: Rather than seeking simple answers, members engaged with the messy realities of healthcare transformation. Their willingness to explore multiple perspectives enriches every discussion.

Sharing Expertise: The diversity of knowledge - from technical architecture to clinical practice to policy analysis - creates a unique learning environment where members genuinely learn from each other.

Fighting Good Fights: Whether challenging referral bureaucracy or defending GP autonomy, the group channels its expertise toward systemic improvements that could benefit both practitioners and patients.

What makes this community unique is its combination of technical sophistication, clinical wisdom, policy understanding, and genuine care for healthcare improvement. Members don't just critique - they contribute constructively whilst maintaining the irreverent spirit that makes complex topics engaging and accessible.

Ready for another week of digital health debates, policy plot twists, and the occasional jazz reference. Keep the notifications coming - there's always more to discuss in the ever-evolving world of AI in the NHS.

Issue 5 compiled from 240+ group messages | Next issue: 12th July 2025

Contributing voices represent NHS clinicians, technology leaders, safety experts, and digital health innovators